The model
Deliberately simple, because a simple model with your data beats a sophisticated one with someone else's benchmarks.
- Contacted leads = monthly leads × contact rate. Everything else received no response at all.
- Fast-handled leads = contacted × the share answered within an hour; the rest are slow-handled.
- Current deals = (fast × fast close rate) + (slow × slow close rate).
- Achievable deals = all monthly leads × fast close rate.
- Gap = achievable − current, valued at your average deal value.
Getting the inputs right
| Input | Source | Common mistake |
|---|---|---|
| Leads per month | CRM record creation count | Counting form submissions rather than records, which hides integration loss |
| Contact rate | Records with at least one genuine contact attempt | Counting logged activity, including calls nobody answered |
| Fast share | Records with first contact within an hour of creation | Measuring from assignment rather than creation |
| Fast close rate | Won ÷ fast-handled, over a full sales cycle | Using a single strong month |
| Slow close rate | Won ÷ slow-handled, same period | Assuming zero — it is rarely zero, and overstating the gap costs credibility |
| Deal value | Average won deal value in the same period | Using list price or a target rather than actual |
Reading the output
Treat the gap as the size of the operating problem, not as a revenue forecast. It answers one question well: is fixing routing worth a fortnight of work, or is the real constraint somewhere else? If the gap is small, the constraint is probably lead quality or offer — and the handoff playbook is a better next step than routing.
- Never-contacted volume above a few percent is a structural failure, not a discipline issue.
- If the fast and slow close rates are almost equal, response time is not your constraint — believe the data.
- Re-run monthly after the change; the same four inputs prove whether the fix held.
Limits
- It assumes lead quality is comparable across the three groups. If your fast-handled leads are also your best leads, the ceiling is optimistic.
- It does not model capacity. Handling every lead fast may require staffing the calculator knows nothing about.
- It ignores nurture recovery, so it slightly overstates permanent loss.
Privacy
All arithmetic runs in your browser. Nothing is sent anywhere.
